| 銆� Back in May 2021, iolo's Affiliate Masterclass covered Google's latest initiative, Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC). The article we covered was Ars Technica's GO FLOC YOURSELF -- Everybody hates "FLoC," Google's tracking plan for Chrome ads. 銆� Good news and bad news. The good news first. FLoC is canceled! (Yay?) The bad news? It will be replaced with 'Topics'. 銆� On the surface, for the ad industry at least, it looks like; 'Out of the frying pan into the fire'. 銆� Like everyone, we keep a close eye on things as they unfold. 銆� FLoC is dead. But Topics won鈥檛 fix Google鈥檚 ad targeting problems. 銆� "It just seems like rearranging deck chairs on the sinking ship of targeted ads." 銆� Google broke the internet last year with its plan to break the internet last year.
Of course, I'm talking about FLoC, Google's poorly named plan to kill off the third-party cookie and allow advertisers to target "cohorts" of anonymous users instead. It managed to piss off everyone, with privacy groups calling it invasive and the ad industry calling it anticompetitive.
Yesterday, Google killed off FLoC, announcing it's replacing it with a shiny new ad-targeting tool called Topics. The idea behind Topics is pretty simple. It's an API that uses people's browsing history to infer their interests in broad topics like, say, fitness. The API will share a rotating subset of those interests with publishers, who can then use them to serve targeted ads on their sites. Users can also delete topics they don't want shared in what Google argues is a much better deal for privacy.
But if Google was expecting a standing ovation from FLoC's critics, it might have been disappointed. The company's plan for Topics has, so far, gotten something between a lukewarm and icy response from the very people who called for FLoC's demise.
"It just seems like rearranging deck chairs on the sinking ship of targeted ads," said Justin Brookman, director of Consumer Privacy at Consumer Reports.
"There's no way to spin this as anything other than a new privacy violation being built into your browser," said Bennett Cyphers, staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
There's no doubt Topics is a slight improvement over FLoC, Cyphers and Brookman acknowledged, but it hardly satisfies the growing movement calling for the eradication of behavioral ad targeting altogether. That includes not just advocates, but lots of Democrats in Congress and lawmakers in Europe who have recently pushed for legislation that would ban targeted ads.
In its announcement, Google emphasized the importance of giving people control over the topics that advertisers use to target them. "Because Topics is powered by the browser, it provides you with a more recognizable way to see and control how your data is shared, compared to tracking mechanisms like third-party cookies," the post read.
But privacy hawks argue that user controls can be the enemy of offering people true privacy in the first place. "It's just not feasible for someone to track and control their Topics on a week-by-week basis: Who would do that?!" Brookman said.
As it happens, Facebook pitched a similar proposal last year but changed course due to privacy concerns. "If automatic inferences are returned based on behavioral data, there is a risk of sensitive information disclosure. I think this is a fair point," Facebook engineer Ben Savage wrote in an online discussion group regarding the proposal.
But just because the privacy world hates Topics doesn't mean the ad world loves it. It may not kill ad targeting, but it will cut ad-tech firms and publishers off from a whole lot of web browsing data they currently have access to -- data Google, which owns the biggest browser in the world, will continue to have access to.
銆� To continue reading the article, please click here. 銆� If you have any questions/comments on the above, please email us.
|
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий